Monday, August 28, 2006
"Consider these words by John Adams, our second president, who also served as chairman of the American Bible Society. In an address to military leaders he said, 'We have no government armed with the power capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and true religion. Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.'"
"Consider these words from George Washington, the Father of our Nation, in his farewell speech on September 19, 1796: 'It is impossible to govern the world without God and the Bible. Of all the dispositions and habits that lead to political prosperity, our religion and morality are the indispensable supporters. Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Reason and experience both forbid us to expect that our national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.'"
"Bible reading was now unconstitutional , though the Bible was quoted 94 percent of the time by those who wrote our constitution and shaped our Nation and its system of education and justice and government."
So, as you can probably guess, it digresses into a diatribe about how Christianity is under attack in this modern, ultra-liberal America which we find ourselves. When I read this -- many many moons ago -- it weighed heavily on me and I found it quite interesting and even wondered if it was true that so many of these founding fathers were so devout as this page unsupportively claims.
That was until today. When I found this extremely interesting page. Not only does it stand in brazen oppossition to the Forsaken Roots article, but it even sites sources. The website makes such claims:
"George Washington, the first president of the United States, never declared himself a Christian according to contemporary reports or in any of his voluminous correspondence....On his deathbed, Washinton uttered no words of a religious nature and did not call for a clergyman to be in attendance."
"It was during [John] Adam's administration that the Senate ratified the Treaty of Peace and Friendship, which states in Article XI that 'the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion.'"
Now, let's make this a little more current. Today, I read this interview with Katherine Harris in which she offers unto us ignorant lay-people her absolutely ingenious interpretation of the constitution:
"...salt and light means not just in the church and not just as a teacher or as a pastor or a banker or a lawyer, but in government and we have to have elected officials in government and we have to have the faithful in government and over time, that lie we have been told, the separation of church and state, people have internalized, thinking that they needed to avoid politics and that is so wrong because God is the one who chooses our rulers."
Now, I've never heard of Katherine Harris before today, but from what my lady-friend tells me, she had alot to do with some disenfrachisment in Florida back in 2000. She also voted 100% of the time in line with the Christian Coalition.
Is the separation of church and state a lie? Regardless, is the religious affiliation of our founding fathers, either individually or as a whole (i.e. mostly Christian, mostly Deist, mostly atheistic), relevant in determining the validity of the constitutitionality of the separation of church and state? How so and why or why not?
Saturday, August 19, 2006
Howdy. How you been? Haven't talked to you for a while. I've been neglecting you, I know. I've just been busy. What with working this job at First Citizens. I sit in a cube. It's kinda lame, but the pay is good. In my spare time, I've been hitting the gym and getting in shape. I haven't been the the gym in the last week because I started work at Theatre in the Park at Pullen Park. I have a very tiny tiny role and they don't pay anything but maybe it will lead to better things down the road. Otherwise life is pretty peachy and I can't really complain and even if I did no one would want to hear it.
But I know no one ever reads this thing anymore, so, I'm gonna complain.
- The President of the United States, a creature of the same Constitution which gave us these amendments, has undisputedly violated the Fourth in failing to procure judicial orders as required by FISA, and accordingly has volated the First Amendment Rights of these Plaintiffs as well.
- Jill Carroll, a freelance reporter for The Christian Science Monitor, was kidnapped by Sunni Muslim insurgents in Baghdad on Jan. 7, 2006. Over the next 82 days, she was shuttled blindfolded among at least six safe houses and had closer contact with Sunni insurgents than any American who has lived to tell the tale. This is her story. This is the first in a multi-part series of which I have read the first four. I highly encourage you to take the time to read all of them. It's really freakin' good...and kinda scary (in a not so "kinda" kinda way).
- "Basically we are not looking for — working for the bomb," the president said. "The problem that President Bush has is in his mind he wants to solve everything with bombs. The time of the bomb is in the past. It's behind us. Today is the era of thoughts, dialogue and cultural exchanges." -- Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
- Snakes on a Plane
- Fight Poverty: Give Cows
Well, Ego, I gotta get going. Thanks for listening. I've got lots to do today including seeing Snakes on a Plane which is totally in line with classic B-films. Anyone who appreciates such awesome films like The Blob, The Fly, Attack of the Killer Tomatoes, or Killer Clowns from Outer Space is practically required to go see this film, and I, fortunately, am in that very bizarre demographic.
I also need to find a new book. I read the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy at work in ten days. I finished in the morning of the day of my 30-day review, at which I was told not to read anymore. But still, that book totally rocked my whole face off and you need to go read it right now. Maybe I'll try The Silmarillion again. Back at CU, I borrowed Andie's copy and only made about a fourth of the way through but I think I'm ready for it now. I also am about halfway done with Plato's The Republic. It's over 300 pages of Socratic dialogue, so I have to read it in parts. I just finished the best part about Plato's creation of the philosopher-king. Afterwards, irony punched me in the kidney.
Take care of yourself, Ego.